Current annualized revenue
$1,290,982Latest-period revenue snapshot.
Account story
Cedar Reserve 120
Cedar Reserve 120 is leaking demand through availability.
Availability recovery needRumModeled account
Tier 2On-premiseDenver, Mountain
Tier 1 candidate
Cedar Reserve 120 is a breakout candidate in Denver. It behaves like a bar peer set with a cocktail-led and a Rum opportunity signal at 98/100.
89
Perfect Account Score
Weighted execution score
Account story
Availability recovery need is the working diagnosis: out-of-stock rate is tracking at 10% against a target of 3%.
Availability Recovery Sprint: Confirm the out-of-stock driver and place a replenishment follow-up on the next account touch.
Compare the account against Bar - breakout candidate peersOpen the evidence behind AvailabilityReview next best playbook owner and verification signal
Growth rate
21.3%Latest modeled period.
Opportunity cluster
Availability recovery needDemand is present, but replenishment and in-stock discipline are leaking sales. Cedar Reserve 120 has rum as the lead category signal.
Primary category
Rum98/100 category signal.
Modeled upsideModeled MVP
$123,115Capped deterministic MVP estimate.
Recommendation confidence
LowBased on visible next-best playbooks.
Human narrative engineAvailability recovery needHigh confidence
Cedar Reserve 120 is leaking demand through availability.
Cedar Reserve 120 is a breakout candidate in Denver. It behaves like a bar peer set with a cocktail-led and a Rum opportunity signal at 98/100.
Availability recovery need is the working diagnosis: out-of-stock rate is tracking at 10% against a target of 3%.
Account score89/100Modeled upside$123KRum signal98/100Out-of-stock rate10% vs 3%
Recommended first moveAvailability Recovery SprintConfirm the out-of-stock driver and place a replenishment follow-up on the next account touch.
Scenario previewNot a forecast
If the top actions are executed
Score89to100
Tier stateTier 2toTier 1 candidate
Tier-up score69%to85%
Upside$0to$123,115
This preview uses the existing deterministic MVP scoring outputs and assumes the highest-priority recommendations are addressed.
Execution diagnosis
Top KPI gaps blocking Perfect Account status
The first-read view shows current vs target and the severity of each execution gap. The full KPI table remains available below.
Out-of-stock rateOut-of-stock rate is above the Perfect Account standard.
Medium gapHigh relevance
Current: 10.1%Target: 3%KPI score: 63/100
Assortment complianceAssortment compliance is below the Perfect Account standard.
Low gapHigh relevance
Current: 70%Target: 84%KPI score: 83/100
Cocktail listing presenceCocktail listing presence is below the Perfect Account standard.
Low gapHigh relevance
Current: 52.6%Target: 62%KPI score: 85/100
Menu presenceMenu presence is below the Perfect Account standard.
Low gapHigh relevance
Current: 62.4%Target: 72%KPI score: 87/100
Promo compliancePromo compliance is below the Perfect Account standard.
Low gapMedium relevance
Current: 73.7%Target: 78%KPI score: 95/100
Recommended next moves
Playbooks tied directly to KPI gaps
Each action stays explainable: gap, evidence, owner, verification signal, priority, confidence, and modeled upside are visible together.
Availability Recovery Sprint
RecommendedConfirm the out-of-stock driver and place a replenishment follow-up on the next account touch.
The biggest fixable gap is out-of-stock rate, and this playbook provides the cleanest next action.
Out-of-stock rate10% vs 3%Category signalRum 98/100Competitor activation26%
Priority SKU Expansion
RecommendedStart with the assortment compliance gap and assign the next accountable owner for Cedar Reserve 120.
The biggest fixable gap is assortment compliance, and this playbook provides the cleanest next action.
Assortment compliance70% vs 84%Category signalRum 98/100Competitor activation26%
Menu Conversion Push
RecommendedPick one priority serve and secure a menu or cocktail-listing commitment.
The account has an on-premise occasion fit, but menu or cocktail presence is below the target standard.
Cocktail listing presence53% vs 62%Category signalRum 98/100Competitor activation26%
Peer benchmarkSynthetic peers
Similar account context
- Peer set
- 50 accounts
- Average PA score
- 85
- Best peer score
- 100
- Avg simulated upside
- $201,172
Use this as directional context only. The MVP compares against synthetic accounts with similar type and channel.
Full score detail
KPI contribution drilldown
Power users can still inspect the full weighted score calculation after the business story is clear.
KPI breakdown
| KPI | Actual | Target | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assortment compliance | 70% | 84% | 12% | 83 | 10.0 |
| Out-of-stock rate | 10.1% | 3% | 13% | 63 | 8.1 |
| Promo compliance | 73.7% | 78% | 6% | 95 | 5.7 |
| Price compliance | 93.1% | 95% | 6% | 98 | 5.9 |
| Menu presence | 62.4% | 72% | 13% | 87 | 11.3 |
| Cocktail listing presence | 52.6% | 62% | 10% | 85 | 8.5 |
| Back-bar share | 18.9% | 18% | 12% | 100 | 12.0 |
| Tap presence | 33.7% | 35% | 7% | 96 | 6.7 |
| POSM presence | 72.3% | 72% | 7% | 100 | 7.0 |
| Corrective action closure | 88.4% | 85% | 5% | 100 | 5.0 |
| Visit frequency | 2.2 | 2.2 | 5% | 100 | 5.0 |
| Task completion rate | 88.2% | 90% | 4% | 98 | 3.9 |
Methodology
Account detail uses the account insight object from the MVP engine. The scenario preview is a display-layer simulation from current score, fixability, top recommendations, and capped upside.