Current annualized revenue
$2,021,700Latest-period revenue snapshot.
Account story
Cedar Pantry 115
Cedar Pantry 115 needs stronger bar visibility before the next visit.
Bar / menu / tap visibility gapWhiskeyModeled account
Tier 2On-premiseDetroit, Midwest
Tier 1 candidate
Cedar Pantry 115 is a breakout candidate in Detroit. It behaves like a restaurant peer set with a dining occasion and a Whiskey opportunity signal at 91/100.
82
Perfect Account Score
Weighted execution score
Account story
Bar / menu / tap visibility gap is the working diagnosis: back-bar share is tracking at 14% against a target of 18%.
Back-Bar Visibility Reset: Secure the target back-bar position and verify it with next-visit photo proof.
Compare the account against Restaurant - breakout candidate peersInspect back-bar placement and bartender visibility proofReview next best playbook owner and verification signal
Growth rate
19.6%Latest modeled period.
Opportunity cluster
Bar / menu / tap visibility gapThe brand is present enough to matter but not visible enough at the point of bartender choice. Cedar Pantry 115 has whiskey as the lead category signal.
Primary category
Whiskey91/100 category signal.
Modeled upsideModeled MVP
$255,336Capped deterministic MVP estimate.
Recommendation confidence
MediumBased on visible next-best playbooks.
Human narrative engineBar / menu / tap visibility gapHigh confidence
Cedar Pantry 115 needs stronger bar visibility before the next visit.
Cedar Pantry 115 is a breakout candidate in Detroit. It behaves like a restaurant peer set with a dining occasion and a Whiskey opportunity signal at 91/100.
Bar / menu / tap visibility gap is the working diagnosis: back-bar share is tracking at 14% against a target of 18%.
Account score82/100Modeled upside$255KWhiskey signal91/100Back-bar share14% vs 18%
Recommended first moveBack-Bar Visibility ResetSecure the target back-bar position and verify it with next-visit photo proof.
Scenario previewNot a forecast
If the top actions are executed
Score82to95
Tier stateTier 2toTier 1 candidate
Tier-up score67%to83%
Upside$0to$179,701
This preview uses the existing deterministic MVP scoring outputs and assumes the highest-priority recommendations are addressed.
Execution diagnosis
Top KPI gaps blocking Perfect Account status
The first-read view shows current vs target and the severity of each execution gap. The full KPI table remains available below.
Out-of-stock rateOut-of-stock rate is above the Perfect Account standard.
Medium gapHigh relevance
Current: 10.2%Target: 3%KPI score: 62/100
Back-bar shareBack-bar share is below the Perfect Account standard.
Medium gapHigh relevance
Current: 13.5%Target: 18%KPI score: 75/100
Price compliancePrice compliance is below the Perfect Account standard.
Medium gapMedium relevance
Current: 73.4%Target: 95%KPI score: 77/100
Promo compliancePromo compliance is below the Perfect Account standard.
Medium gapMedium relevance
Current: 60.8%Target: 78%KPI score: 78/100
Assortment complianceAssortment compliance is below the Perfect Account standard.
Low gapHigh relevance
Current: 74.7%Target: 84%KPI score: 89/100
Menu presenceMenu presence is below the Perfect Account standard.
Low gapHigh relevance
Current: 65.6%Target: 72%KPI score: 91/100
Recommended next moves
Playbooks tied directly to KPI gaps
Each action stays explainable: gap, evidence, owner, verification signal, priority, confidence, and modeled upside are visible together.
Back-Bar Visibility Reset
RecommendedSecure the target back-bar position and verify it with next-visit photo proof.
The account has on-premise demand potential, but back-bar visibility is below the standard needed to influence bartender choice.
Back-bar share14% vs 18%Category signalWhiskey 91/100Competitor activation45%
Menu Conversion Push
RecommendedPick one priority serve and secure a menu or cocktail-listing commitment.
The account has an on-premise occasion fit, but menu or cocktail presence is below the target standard.
Cocktail listing presence59% vs 62%Category signalWhiskey 91/100Competitor activation45%
Availability Recovery Sprint
RecommendedConfirm the out-of-stock driver and place a replenishment follow-up on the next account touch.
The biggest fixable gap is out-of-stock rate, and this playbook provides the cleanest next action.
Out-of-stock rate10% vs 3%Category signalWhiskey 91/100Competitor activation45%
Price Compliance Check
RecommendedStart with the price compliance gap and assign the next accountable owner for Cedar Pantry 115.
The biggest fixable gap is price compliance, and this playbook provides the cleanest next action.
Price compliance73% vs 95%Category signalWhiskey 91/100Competitor activation45%
Peer benchmarkSynthetic peers
Similar account context
- Peer set
- 31 accounts
- Average PA score
- 82
- Best peer score
- 99
- Avg simulated upside
- $508,734
Use this as directional context only. The MVP compares against synthetic accounts with similar type and channel.
Full score detail
KPI contribution drilldown
Power users can still inspect the full weighted score calculation after the business story is clear.
KPI breakdown
| KPI | Actual | Target | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assortment compliance | 74.7% | 84% | 12% | 89 | 10.7 |
| Out-of-stock rate | 10.2% | 3% | 13% | 62 | 8.1 |
| Promo compliance | 60.8% | 78% | 6% | 78 | 4.7 |
| Price compliance | 73.4% | 95% | 6% | 77 | 4.6 |
| Menu presence | 65.6% | 72% | 13% | 91 | 11.8 |
| Cocktail listing presence | 58.6% | 62% | 10% | 95 | 9.4 |
| Back-bar share | 13.5% | 18% | 12% | 75 | 9.0 |
| Tap presence | 30% | 35% | 7% | 86 | 6.0 |
| POSM presence | 58.2% | 72% | 7% | 81 | 5.7 |
| Corrective action closure | 70.6% | 85% | 5% | 83 | 4.2 |
| Visit frequency | 1.8 | 2.2 | 5% | 82 | 4.1 |
| Task completion rate | 75.7% | 90% | 4% | 84 | 3.4 |
Methodology
Account detail uses the account insight object from the MVP engine. The scenario preview is a display-layer simulation from current score, fixability, top recommendations, and capped upside.