Latest-period revenue snapshot.
Lakeside Taproom 114
Lakeside Taproom 114 is losing too much visible space to competitors.
Tier 1 candidate
Lakeside Taproom 114 is a breakout candidate in NY Metro. It behaves like a club store peer set with a premium shelf and a Tequila opportunity signal at 94/100.
Weighted execution score
Competitor shelf pressure is the working diagnosis: share of shelf is tracking at 21% against a target of 25%.
Shelf Defense Reset: Run a quick shelf audit and request a reset where competitor share is crowding the account.
Latest modeled period.
Competitors are occupying too much shelf or display space in accounts with material upside. Lakeside Taproom 114 has tequila as the lead category signal.
94/100 category signal.
Capped deterministic MVP estimate.
Based on visible next-best playbooks.
Lakeside Taproom 114 is losing too much visible space to competitors.
Lakeside Taproom 114 is a breakout candidate in NY Metro. It behaves like a club store peer set with a premium shelf and a Tequila opportunity signal at 94/100.
Competitor shelf pressure is the working diagnosis: share of shelf is tracking at 21% against a target of 25%.
If the top actions are executed
This preview uses the existing deterministic MVP scoring outputs and assumes the highest-priority recommendations are addressed.
Top KPI gaps blocking Perfect Account status
The first-read view shows current vs target and the severity of each execution gap. The full KPI table remains available below.
Playbooks tied directly to KPI gaps
Each action stays explainable: gap, evidence, owner, verification signal, priority, confidence, and modeled upside are visible together.
Run a quick shelf audit and request a reset where competitor share is crowding the account.
Competitive pressure is high enough that the visibility gap should be treated as a defensive reset.
Confirm the out-of-stock driver and place a replenishment follow-up on the next account touch.
The biggest fixable gap is out-of-stock rate, and this playbook provides the cleanest next action.
Similar account context
- Peer set
- 13 accounts
- Average PA score
- 85
- Best peer score
- 97
- Avg simulated upside
- $208,131
Use this as directional context only. The MVP compares against synthetic accounts with similar type and channel.
KPI contribution drilldown
Power users can still inspect the full weighted score calculation after the business story is clear.
KPI breakdown
| KPI | Actual | Target | Weight | Score | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assortment compliance | 92.8% | 90% | 13% | 100 | 13.0 |
| Out-of-stock rate | 10% | 4% | 14% | 71 | 10.0 |
| Share of shelf | 21.4% | 25% | 12% | 86 | 10.3 |
| Facings | 34 | 34 | 8% | 100 | 8.0 |
| Shelf placement quality | 80.4% | 84% | 7% | 96 | 6.7 |
| Display compliance | 77.4% | 75% | 10% | 100 | 10.0 |
| Promo compliance | 81.6% | 84% | 7% | 97 | 6.8 |
| Price compliance | 97% | 95% | 6% | 100 | 6.0 |
| Cooler share | 11% | 12% | 6% | 92 | 5.5 |
| POSM presence | 79.4% | 78% | 6% | 100 | 6.0 |
| Corrective action closure | 74.2% | 85% | 5% | 87 | 4.4 |
| Visit frequency | 1.5 | 1.6 | 3% | 94 | 2.8 |
| Task completion rate | 86.7% | 90% | 3% | 96 | 2.9 |
Methodology
Account detail uses the account insight object from the MVP engine. The scenario preview is a display-layer simulation from current score, fixability, top recommendations, and capped upside.